Ogham Readings on Saturdays

Dec. 5th, 2025 09:01 pm
kimberlysteele: (Default)
[personal profile] kimberlysteele



I am happy to read your Ogham free of charge -- that's how I hone my divination skills. Please limit your reading request to four or fewer Ogham cards: though this can take many forms, here are some common ones (all of them are basically combos of 4 cards):

 
-a single three card reading for the week or month and a one-off, one card reading
-four questions about four separate items that require one answer (card) per item
-a one card reading to answer a specific question and a three card for a more nuanced question
-Two separate readings, two cards a piece exploring the positives and negatives of two different choices

I am happy to do Ogham readings confidentially via emails -- just email me at k steele studio at gmail during the allotted time/before deadline. I cannot answer health questions. If you have a question about health or another sensitive, private matter, provide a bunch of non-identifying information and the Ogham will be able to figure it out even if I don't. I'm serious... the Ogham actually tend to "know" things without me being privy to what is going on.

Please note I take time off during Solstices and Equinoxes for Druid stuff and because sometimes I simply need a break.

My next planned break is from December 18 - January 8.

I take reading requests from whenever this post goes up on Friday night until 8pm US Central Time Saturday.

For a more in depth look into how I read and interpret the Ogham's symbols, please visit my website druidogham.wordpress.com.

I am currently trying to minimize my use of PayPal. If you'd like to make a donation, I would be grateful if you did it here:

http://buymeacoffee.com/kimberlysteele

Your prayers of blessing to the deity/deities of your choice are welcome whether or not you can donate.

kimberlysteele: (Default)
[personal profile] kimberlysteele

Around 2022, when people were still cavorting about in restaurants with masks, I went to Olive Garden with my husband and family. When I went to the bathroom, it got gross. Someone had projectile vomited all over the floor, sinks, and toilet stalls. The whole room reeked of barf. As is typical of casual American restaurants, there was no specialized department to take care of the mess, so a server (presumably one with a strong stomach) went in with disinfectant and mop to do the job. I overheard the servers talking about how it was the third time that week. I chalked up the episode as the predicament of the MRNA “vaccines”.

Considering my area was one of the most heavily compliant, with upwards of 90 percent opting to get the mystery jab, I figured the Olive Garden spewer was just another statistic in the sordid list of Pfizer/Moderna/Johnson side effects. I did not suspect Ozempic or its competitors at the time, although now in hindsight, the Olive Garden “play stupid games, win stupid prizes” barf mine maze may have been provided by a Big Pharma character I did not suspect at the time: Novo Nordisk.

Brought to you by monsters

Speaking of playing stupid games and winning stupid prizes, I was last week years old when I found out GLP-1 drugs were “inspired” by the Gila monster, a prehistoric relic that eats all of once or twice per year. Novo Nordisk presumably tortured many of these animals to death in the grand style of Anthony Fauci’s sand fly/beagle experiment in order to isolate the elusive substance. They were first in line to develop hunger-suppressing semaglutide drugs and quickly outpaced Pfizer as the most profitable drug company in human history.

The Gila monster’s venom contains a substance known as exendin-4, which slows down digestion and increases insulin. When the Gila monster deigns to put food in its stomach, it subsists on stolen eggs from birds and other reptiles, baby rats, baby chicks, and carrion. In other words, the Gila monster is the OG System ghoul in lizard form, devouring fetuses and infants when it is not relishing in corpseflesh a la Jimmy Savile. David Icke is probably having a field day.

Novo Nordisk’s semaglutide debut, Ozempic, quickly overtook the sketchy MRNA products as the real injection to end all injections. GLP-1 drugs revolutionized the diet scene by making patients uninterested in food. If a patient slipped into old habits and indulged in her old favorite neverending pasta bowl at Olive Garden, that Shrimp Carbonara was highly likely to end up all over the toilet and sinks as revenge for eating it, along with copious amounts of neverending salad and bread sticks.

Strap in, because this is nowhere near the last time I will mention abuse

GLP-1 drugs were born to be abused. I first heard of Ozempic because the Kardashians were rumored to be using it along with the removal of their butt implants. They were not using it for its so-called intended purpose, which is ostensibly to manage diabetes. Even the diabetics for whom GLP-1s are prescribed abuse them. One type II diabetic I know by proxy brags that he can now drink all of the sugary soda he wants because he is on Ozempic. His blood sugar levels remain within the window of normal despite the fact he guzzles carbonated corn syrup like it is water.

There was never even a question celebrities would abuse GLP-1 drugs. As the vainest and most entitled people on the planet, they would never pass up an injection that offered “free” weight loss, even if this led to shortages1 of the drug for the people for whom it was ostensibly designed. Furthermore, I believe we are seeing GLP-1 abuse among those who need it the least: anorexics. I am not making any allegations here, but if I was the betting sort, I would put money on all three out of three of the current visibly anorexic Wick(ED) movie superstars abusing Ozempic. Yes, I am going to discuss Ariana Grande in a minute.

Ally goddamn McBeal

Back when Ariana Grande was only four years old in 1997, a dry, desiccated turd emerged from the bowels of Fox in the form of a television series called Ally McBeal. Ally McBeal (1997-2002) was mostly a vehicle for the fetishization of 1990s anorexic It Girl Calista Flockhart, a human lollipop who scored Harrison Ford as a fiancée and later spouse. Though Calista Flockhart is nearly unknown now, her pouty face and Defend Your Castle body were plastered all over the turn of the millennium. Calista Flockhart as Ally McBeal was a lawyer in a male-dominated profession who narrated a riff track to her own life, including her fantasies. Ally’s fantasy life was explored through cheesy special effects, including a three foot long tongue and an annoying dancing baby that represented her biological clock. Ally McBeal’s brand of sardonic, wisecracking, cooler-than-thou comedy obviously did not appeal to me but it was an extremely popular show at the time.

The cringe of Ally McBeal was sadly not limited to special effects. Nearly every single female character on the show looked visibly emaciated. Rumors flew that the women of Ally McBeal were embroiled in a competition to see who could lose the most weight. The stars were said to have treadmills in their dressing rooms. According to blinds, they ate as few as 150 calories per day, abusing laxatives if an upcoming scene required a state of undress. Portia DeRossi, who was involved with Ellen DeGeneres but did not wed her until 2004, suffered organ failure in the year 2000 after dropping to 82 pounds (37kg). Portia DeRossi is 5’8” tall.

To this day, Calista Flockhart denies any role she has played in the mental poisoning of the women surrounding Ally McBeal or the generations who watched it. Flockhart claims that she is naturally thin. Perhaps she is gaslighting us and perhaps she is not. When we look at who is to blame, it is convenient to point fingers at the bobble-headed It Girl. We all know who was truly at fault for the anorexic zeal of Ally McBeal: the show’s producers. David E. Kelley, the ex-lawyer who was also behind L.A. Law and Doogie Howser, M.D., co-produced the show with Bill D’Elia. Without the consent of Kelley (who has been married to über-skinny Michelle Pfeiffer since the 1990s) there could have been no mass exportation of the Ally McBeal image.

Hide your kids from Wicked: For Good

If I had children, I would either forbid or heartily dissuade them from viewing Wicked: For Good. Before I go any further, I would like to place the mantle of blame for the anorexia these films promoted and inspired upon each show’s respective producers and directors. The newest Wicked film, which is a sequel to the Wizard of Oz spinoff musical Wicked that was popular in the 1990s, features Ariana Grande as Good Witch Galinda and Cynthia Erivo (a race-swapped Bad Witch Elphaba) as its main characters.

No iteration of the Wizard of Oz has been free of anorexic torture and Wicked I and II are no exception. In the original Wizard of Oz movie, Judy Garland, once a robust show kid, was coerced into dieting and drugging herself down to a weight in which she never thrived. In the 1978 adaptation of L. Frank Baum’s books, the Wiz, singer Diana Ross battled with anorexia nervosa that coincided with an extreme amount of stress allegedly put on to her via her MoTown producer, Barry Gordy. Wicked I and II do not have a Dorothy character to torment, so the emaciation banner has been passed to not one, not two, but three separate lead characters in the film: Michelle Yeoh, Cynthia Erivo, and Ariana Grande.

All formerly healthy-looking stars have wasted away over the last half decade of Wicked film production. Michelle Yeoh, a former action star, looks like she could squeeze into a paper towel tube if no clothing was available. I’m guessing this state of affairs is a matter of demented pride for her at 63 years old. She went from Flying Tiger, Hidden Dragon to Starving Greyhound, Hidden Agenda.

Cynthia Erivo has a beautiful, heavily awarded voice, and she deserves vocal awards. Though I refuse to see Wicked: For Good at this point, I saw the first Wicked film not too long ago and Erivo actually out-sang Ariana Grande from my point of view. She has pipes. Unfortunately, Wicked has also been Erivo’s demise into emaciation, with the formerly svelte looking actress looking like a bag of bones with press on nails. Yeoh and Erivo look as if they might return from the Land of the Dead once Wicked reaches the bargain DVD bin at Walmart. Ariana Grande does not.

The Ariana Grande death pool

I’m not the only one who thinks that Ariana Grande looks as if she is at death’s door. Recently, rumors circulated that the singer/actress had died, and considering how skeletal she has become. Though the rumors were part of a hoax, it is telling that nobody would be surprised if the Grande keeled over.

It is entirely possible that Grande was never mentally healthy, not even once in her life. Now in her mid-thirties, she is breaking down in real time, the wages of three plus decades of pretending to be above it all dragging her to the bowels of hell. As I have said in the past, Grande has all the markers of a CIA Monarch bot who has been trained from infancy to be pliant. I am not alleging her parents abused or sold her, but I would not be shocked if such revelations came to light.

Many speculate that Ariana Grande has been anorexic for a long time. There was an old Tumblr account attributed to Ariana Grande during her Nickelodeon/Sam & Cat era, and it was full of weight loss flexes such as Ariana bragging about eating a single dragonfruit in an entire busy day and copious photos of Grande in Disappearing Princess mode. Thigh gaps, or selfies that displayed the natural space between a woman’s thighs when she reaches a certain level of thinness, were all the rage. Beyonce became obsessed with Photoshopping herself as a thinner person with thigh gaps. A woman calling herself Felice Fawn became a thinspiration superstar, launching untold numbers of young women into lifelong careers as anorectics.

Ariana Grande’s long sojourn as an actress and pop star have been chock full of nods to anorexia. She was about as subtle about anorexia in her pre-Wicked career as she was about being sexually active. As a kid, accused-pedophile creep Dan Schneider had her sticking her fingers down her throat in a Sam & Cat episode where she “explored her uvula”. The impression the scene gives (this is a show for kids, mind you) is that Dan is getting off on her adolescent bulimia. I guess children’s feet are not the only things he was into.

I think Grande was always anorexic and possibly bulimic, and the evidence for this is rife not only in that old Tumblr account (which may or may not have been Grande herself) but in her music videos. Side to Side, one of her many tacky, heavily blaccented songs from the 2010s, features Grande on an exercise bike, as if she needs it. Her other videos are populated with self-checking as Grande tests various surfaces to see how tiny she looks in comparison to them. Grande was known for wanting to be carried everywhere she went in 2014. A supposed Life & Style magazine insider reported, “Her new rule is that she has to be carried, literally carried like a baby when she doesn’t feel like walking. She says that she doesn’t want her precious feet to hit the floor.”

I don’t think it was about her feet. It was about her micro-weight and her desire to infantilize herself. Ariana Grande wants to vanish. She wants to become a baby: minuscule and beloved.

Mortify the flesh

A shocking number of canonized saints, all women, were anorexic. Women have been starving themselves for a long time. Saint Catherine of Siena (1347-1380) used to gag herself with sticks and tree branches when she was forced to eat. Marie of Oignies (1177-1213) survived for years on only the consecrated bread of the host. She preferred to eat it when the crust was so hard, it would make her mouth bleed. A common theme we see with anorexics, whether of the nervosa or mirabilis variety, is the desire to inflict pain upon themselves. Any given anorexic is a sadist and a masochist wrapped up in one. Starvation becomes addiction.

The obese starve in their own way too, and they are also sadists and masochists balled up in the same, fractured psyche. Both anorexia and obesity are disorders of dependency. The obese person wants to stop overeating, but at some point, it becomes hardwired into the system. Severe anorexia is even less reversible. Anorexics who are too far gone cannot start eating normally again even if they want to. Those who claw their way out and legitimately recover often die anyway. Caroline Knapp, author of the anorexic memoir Appetites: Why Women Want, died at age 42 after beating anorexia and alcoholism.

Karen Carpenter seems to have legitimately tried to get better. She lived with her psychotherapist Steven Levenkron for a period and she got a little traction in the time she spent with him, going from 79 pounds to nearly 100. Wanting to get back to work on singing, she left Levenkron’s care before she was truly done and most likely relapsed into purging and laxative abuse. Carpenter admitted taking up to 90 laxative pills at a time in order to stay thin. Laxatives, starvation, and purging had taken their toll. She died at age 33 of a heart attack, cutting her brilliant music career off in one fell swoop.

I will be discussing in future articles about how I feel anorexia and obesity are two sides of the same coin, with the substance of the coin being a failure to be grateful. As much as I can already see the chronically bored outrage trolls coming for me with “You’re blaming the victim!” and “Patriarchy!” I truly do see eating disorders as diseases of entitlement, which makes them especially dangerous when they are foisted upon the young and naive, who cannot see them for what they truly are. Shame on those who promote ED culture and its fetishes, and I do mean EVERYONE who engages in it, and shame on the producers of mainstream media who would market that trash to anyone at all.

 

 

 

denise: Image: Me, facing away from camera, on top of the Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (Default)
[staff profile] denise posting in [site community profile] dw_news
Hello, friends! It's about to be December again, and you know what that means: the fact I am posting this actually before December 1 means [staff profile] karzilla reminded me about the existence of linear time again. Wait, no -- well, yes, but also -- okay, look, let me back up and start again: it's almost December, and that means it's time for our annual December holiday points bonus.

The standard explanation: For the entire month of December, all orders made in the Shop of points and paid time, either for you or as a gift for a friend, will have 10% of your completed cart total sent to you in points when you finish the transaction. For instance, if you buy an order of 12 months of paid time for $35 (350 points), you'll get 35 points when the order is complete, to use on a future purchase.

The fine print and much more behind this cut! )

Thank you, in short, for being the best possible users any social media site could possibly ever hope for. I'm probably in danger of crossing the Sappiness Line if I haven't already, but you all make everything worth it.

On behalf of Mark, Jen, Robby, and our team of awesome volunteers, and to each and every one of you, whether you've been with us on this wild ride since the beginning or just signed up last week, I'm wishing you all a very happy set of end-of-year holidays, whichever ones you celebrate, and hoping for all of you that your 2026 is full of kindness, determination, empathy, and a hell of a lot more luck than we've all had lately. Let's go.
kimberlysteele: (Default)
[personal profile] kimberlysteele

Exciting news! My book is available for pre-order!

Sacred Homemaking: A Magical Approach to a Tidier Home has come to fruition much more quickly than I thought it would and I could not be more delighted. Thanks to the amazing team at Aeon Books, Sacred Homemaking is my dream literally coming true.

In Sacred Homemaking, I seek to bring a fresh voice to the tidying genre as popularized by Marie Kondo (The Life Changing Magic of Tidying Up) and Swedish Death Cleaning that delves deeply into magic, including the foundational magic of gratitude. It's not just about sorting stuff and getting rid of stuff -- to make a sacred home involves the cultivation of sensitivity and balance that has been all but discarded in our current era of spiritual leprosy.

It is much easier to clean and maintain items that you have appreciation for, and when we treat the things and spaces in our life well, we start treating the people like they matter too. Gratitude is what connects us to the spirit of place, and though many seek to dismiss talking to the spirits of place and objects as woo, that strange habit weaves a net of spells around you and your surroundings that is the ultimate natural magic without ever having to pick up a wand or wear a funny hat.

Use the code SACRED20 to get 20 percent off until April 30, 2026!




Ogham Readings on Saturdays

Nov. 29th, 2025 12:26 am
kimberlysteele: (Default)
[personal profile] kimberlysteele



I am happy to read your Ogham free of charge -- that's how I hone my divination skills. Please limit your reading request to four or fewer Ogham cards: though this can take many forms, here are some common ones (all of them are basically combos of 4 cards):

 
-a single three card reading for the week or month and a one-off, one card reading
-four questions about four separate items that require one answer (card) per item
-a one card reading to answer a specific question and a three card for a more nuanced question
-Two separate readings, two cards a piece exploring the positives and negatives of two different choices

I am happy to do Ogham readings confidentially via emails -- just email me at k steele studio at gmail during the allotted time/before deadline. I cannot answer health questions. If you have a question about health or another sensitive, private matter, provide a bunch of non-identifying information and the Ogham will be able to figure it out even if I don't. I'm serious... the Ogham actually tend to "know" things without me being privy to what is going on.

Please note I take time off during Solstices and Equinoxes for Druid stuff and because sometimes I simply need a break.

My next planned break is from December 18 - January 8.

I take reading requests from whenever this post goes up on Friday night until 8pm US Central Time Saturday.

For a more in depth look into how I read and interpret the Ogham's symbols, please visit my website druidogham.wordpress.com.

I am currently trying to minimize my use of PayPal. If you'd like to make a donation, I would be grateful if you did it here:

http://buymeacoffee.com/kimberlysteele

Your prayers of blessing to the deity/deities of your choice are welcome whether or not you can donate.

Book Review: Hunt, Gather, Parent

Nov. 25th, 2025 11:20 am
claire_58: (Default)
[personal profile] claire_58
 Hunt, Gather, Parent: what ancient cultures can teach us about the lost art of raising happy, helpful little humans by Michaeleen Doucleff PhD

 

Book Review

 

Hunt, Gather, Parent is a parenting manual that is actually well worth the time it takes to read. Doucleff and her 3year old daughter take us on a intimate tour to places and people whose parenting strategies are very different than those of the West. She shares the personal challenges and parental failings that spurred her to travel, research, and learn. More importantly she has broken out the specific strategies and techniques and demonstrated how to use them in the context of modern parenting.

 

The stories generated by her quest are engaging. The peoples she visits, Mayan, Inuit, and Hadzabe, are not untouched by the modern world but, crucially, they have managed to retain parenting techniques that have stood the test of time. The real treasure of the book is a very specific set of  skills that can have an immediate positive impact on family life.

 

The book is divided into 5 sections. Section one is an introduction which examines the challenges of parenting in the W.E.I.R.D. world. The main bulk of the book contains one section for each of the cultures she visits including the important skills each has to offer. The final section is a summary of the paradigm shift involved in changing the way we interact with our children.

 

The skills Doucleff describes are specific, practical, easy to use techniques. “Try It” exercises that include “dip your toe in,” and “jump in,” are sprinkled liberally throughout the book. A handy list of “Practical Sections” is attached to the Table of Contents for quick reference. 

 

Doucleff emphasizes that these techniques can be used with children of any age and includes age specific approaches where applicable. She has used them successfully with her own daughter and with other children who have visited in her home. She has even used them when dealing with co-workers and other unrelated adults. 

 

The techniques in this book can’t solve the larger W.E.I.R.D. world problems of parent-child isolation or the lack of community support and shared assumptions about how to parent. No single book can. But they can help all of us discover or rediscover the joy of parenting and the ease of harmonious relationships with the tiny humans entrusted to our care.

kimberlysteele: (Default)
[personal profile] kimberlysteele
 
 Clockwise from top left: Frances McDormand, Sigourney Weaver, Morgan Freeman, Emma Thompson, Viola Davis, Brigitte Bardot
 
Last week, I published an essay called Chopped that got a surprising amount of traction. I publish two essays a week, one public essay here at Dreamwidth that is reblogged on Substack and one private, Substack subscriber only essay that gets added to a collection that readers can access via a paywall of either $5 a month or $40 per year. The Chopped essay blew up on Substack. I usually get around 300 readers for any given essay on Substack; less than a week after writing it, Chopped has surpassed the 10,000 mark. Part of this surge in popularity was a single paragraph about transexual hormones and surgeries as part of the barbarism of modern surgical amputation practices. This apparently pissed off the Delusion Affirming Care/child genital mutilation fetishist crowd. They further boosted Chopped's visibility by leaving butthurt troll comments with predictable outrage and demands that I show citations and credentials. The underemployed liberal women were so mad that I did not kowtow to their wishes that I censor myself, they made sure to promote the evilly evil evilness of Kimberly Steele in every corner of Substack for fear that the entire platform would not realize I am a mean bully. As a previous unknown, I owe them my thanks for all the free publicity.

Clearly people want to discuss the hideous evils of plastic surgery and youth chasing procedures, and I will be writing about those subjects in the future. For now, I am going to pull a Pollyanna and focus on the positive, because even though it may only appeal to my old numbers of readers, it is one of my core philosophies and aims in life to build up the good by relentlessly focusing upon it.

They Live

The expansion in number of both famous and non-famous people who opt for ghastly, faux-youth extending procedures and treatments is not going to halt anytime soon. Goldie Hawn, who of all people should have known better, became Death Becomes Her. Lauren Sanchez's face looks like a pincushion, and chances are it acts like one too whenever she is behind a beauty "expert's" closed doors. Jocelyn Wildenstein looks like Frankenstein's monster, a patchwork of scar tissue, her expressions constrained and tight as she squints through a heavy, inflexible mask of rope and hardened bands that appear as if one or more will snap if she sneezes. More ghoulish than the botched, Saw doll Madame puppets are the plastic ice princesses. They look like slightly different alters of their own young selves. They might be clones. Kris Jenner, Martha Stewart, and Lindsay Lohan are not the ones we knew. At least the butchered versions of Goldie Hawn, Lauren Sanchez, and Wilden-franken-stein assuredly still walk among the living. Poor Lindsay Lohan appears to have been erased and replaced, her entire drug-addled history vanished down an eerie memory hole. She emerged into 2024's scenery eight inches taller, sans her trademark freckles, and beige blond like an AI butterfly from a cocoon of black mirrors.

Who knows what uncanny, Stepford transformations and soul swaps await the current set of Hollywood freaks who dress old hunks of moldy, petrified cheese in surface layers of bright, orange Velveeta? 

Not all celebrities . . . 

Let's forget those losers for a hot minute to look at some unusual, lucid examples of what sane aging looks like. I am not going to speak to the potentially problematical personalities or misdeeds of any of the following celebrities. That is not the point of this essay, though I will not prevent anyone from discussing it in the comments. 

I would like to sing the praises of some famous people who have had little to no work done, that is all, in hopes of encouraging more people to tread the same unadulterated path.

Frances McDormand is a very good actress, and perhaps if any actress could have pulled off a perpetual LARP of an ingenue, it was her. She definitely had the acting chops. Thankfully, she has not chosen to go that route. McDormand was never a bombshell, and her roles have reflected this sober reality over the years: she is more gritty than pretty. Affable and funny, she has stayed relatable. Nevertheless, like many celebrities, she is a good looking person with excellent bone structure. She has thin lips. Instead of making her lips into small rubber tires, she looks refreshingly human.

Sigourney Weaver and Frances McDormand could be sisters by another mister, both in looks and in their avoidance of bombshell roles over the years. Like McDormand, Weaver could never pull off the cupcake princess schtick anyway, and perhaps that has been her secret weapon all along. She too has small lips. She has taken a hard pass when it comes to inflating her mouth to resemble the ass of a baboon in heat. Her hooded eyes have the loveliest of creases under them. They are a nice complement to her other stately wrinkles, hopefully the markers of a life well-lived.

Morgan Freeman is almost 90 and does not look a day over 78 LOL. He is as bald as a cue ball these days. My father, who died at 85, had little to no hair from age 35 onward. Men go bald. This is not a big deal. Seeing it is also not a big deal. Again, Freeman has excellent celebrity bone structure, and that bone structure has not betrayed him. He has sagging and white hair on his brows and chin as we would expect.

Viola Davis is a good, young looking 60, her face and body only hinting at the march of age. She does not, however, look 20 in any way, shape, or form, and thank heaven and her own good taste and foresight for that. Her forehead wrinkles like a crumpled paper sack when she scowls or cries. There are no fillers to stiffen it or to make her cheeks inflate like water balloons. In a sea of human flotation devices, she has opted not to look like a mannequin with a peanut allergy.

Emma Thompson got in hot water when she called modern day plastic youth chasing a "collective psychosis" and "a very strange thing to do". In a 2014 Hello Magazine interview, Thompson said, 
 

"It's chronically unhealthy and there's this very serious side to all of that because we're going to end up with this sort of 'super-culture' that's going to suggest to young people, girls and boys, that this looks normal. And it's not normal."


We have arrived at the super-culture of which Thompson spoke. Rhinoplasty, Botox, fillers, and lip fillers are all the rage among Gen Z, the average member of which is in her early 20s. Yikes. 

Thompson's ongoing condemnation of plastic procedures triggered RealSelf writer Suzy Katz, who describes herself as a recovering plastic surgery addict. Katz quickly pounced on Thompson's proclamations in her more recent interview, accusing Thompson of blaming women for the "intense scrutiny society puts on their looks".

The idea that "society", that vague, amorphous monolith that cannot be boiled down to any individual's choices, is the ultimate motivation for dicing up your own face like a Thanksgiving turkey, is ludicrous. It is a cop out and a ruse. 

I am society. You are society. We are all society and therefore we share the responsibility of making society. Suzy Katz would like to diffuse and abdicate responsibility, but I will argue that she stood for nothing and fell for everything. 

I can forgive her for this sin despite her not asking for my forgiveness. We all have been hoodwinked at some time or another, and plastic surgery/procedure people, with their mutilated faces and bodies, are forced to wear the permanent marks of having been made into somebody's bitch. Their plight is understandable and forgivable. What I cannot forgive is the arrogant doubling down on the claim that wearing youth like a minstrel's mask is defensible and good. I grow especially prickly when the victims of such grotesque procedures insist they are normal and healthy.

Ugly on the inside


The bone I have to pick with the transhumanist meat Lego/Potato Head project is that it trains each successive generation with increased intensity to focus its time, resources, and medical expertise on stuff that does not deserve to matter, especially once we have reached a certain age. It is one thing for a teenager to be obsessed with fashion, hair, and other manifestations of etheric maleness, but teenage dreams have no place in middle age. The austerity of middle age is not superior to the frivolity of youth; neither is better nor worse than the other. The key is recognizing that they are both very different to each other, and to each there is a season.

In my own case, a solid decade of daily discursive meditation and slightly less time spent in daily banishing rituals and divination have transformed middle age into the happiest, most fruitful, and tranquil era of my life. Perception deepens in middle age, or at least it has for me, and despite writing two essays per week for the last two years and producing an upcoming book called Sacred Homemaking: A Magical Approach to Tidying, I only ever put the tiniest amount of my perceptions into my scribblings. 

How to be popular

As a former dysmorphic, middle age has been especially healing for its release of daily concern about my looks. I have finally gotten it through my own thick skull that others do not care what I look like (with proper exceptions for decency and hygiene, of course). No, others want to be SEEN, and not for their physical beauty or its flaws, but for the goodness and light they hold within. 

Make a point of regularly seeing beyond hairstyles, clothing, acne outbreaks, and weight and you will be more popular than you ever dreamed you could become. Like you, others desperately want to be appreciated and thanked for their good works. It really is that simple. 

I appreciate the guy who bagged my groceries quickly and neatly. He did far better than I could do in the same amount of time. I thank him. Nothing elaborate, just a quick "Thank you" and a smile that meets his eyes. When someone stayed stopped on the way into the intersection to allow my car into the line, I always wave because he or she did not have to stop for me. When my husband does the dishes, buys snacks, or makes dinner, I always thank him at least once. I do not do it out of obeisance or guilt, but because I genuinely appreciate not having to do those things for myself. 

My focus is not on people's looks and in return, their focus is not on my looks. At age 52, I still field compliments addressing the way I look, though they are not nearly as frequent as they used to be. I was always a young looking person despite having avoided cosmetic procedures, and though I am a little overweight, I have always barely squeezed into the current ideal of thinness enough to pass. I am the perfect candidate for a brutalist makeover that would convince the world I am 25 again. No thanks.

I had my moment in the sun. I was extremely pretty and my body was spectacular at age 20. I also took antidepressants, smoked cigarettes, and barely ate when I was 20. I was gorgeous and dreadfully unhappy. In middle age, I am no longer drop dead gorgeous but I am happy. Having lived through both, they do sometimes seem to be mutually exclusive realms. I'll happily take the second one over the first.

 


Brigitte Bardot, then and now


The sexiest woman alive

Brigitte Bardot was arguably once the sexiest woman alive. She was hotter than I ever was at the same age, and chances are she was hotter than you at that age. Bo Derek, the supposed Perfect 10, was more like an 8.5 compared to Bardot at her peak. Bardot's fate was to be cast and re-cast as a bimbo with only a few serious roles. Like Marilyn Monroe, most audiences never fully accepted Bardot as anything but eye candy. Of course unlike Monroe, Bardot survived to the current day. Along the way, however, she lost her looks, and much to the chagrin of the System, this seems to have been deliberate. Bardot gained weight, got some jowls, and generally did not alter what age brought. She is now 91 and looks 91. Her hair is gray, her neck is craggy and sagging, and her decolletage is well-covered. She is perfect. She is how I imagine I will be at 91 if I do things right. 

Bardot came out strong for animal activism in 1962 and later said, "I gave my youth and beauty to men. I gave my wisdom and experience to animals." 

Bardot often felt hunted, especially as a young beauty, and had she gone down the well-traveled road of plastic renewals, she would have perpetuated more of the same. Instead, she flipped the script. She gave the proverbial bird to the drooling, pornified, sex-on-the-brain coomers and allowed Nature to mute her beauty, at least on the outside.

Sounds like a solid plan.
 



Page generated Dec. 8th, 2025 10:54 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios